» Sunday, February 05, 2012 Register  «  Login  «
   Search
 Turbines hazardous to wildlife habitat: Amherst resident   
Location: Blogsregional energy news    
Posted by: atlantic energy Thursday, May 15, 2008
AMHERST - An Amherst-area resident is continuing his fight to stop a proposed wind farm on the marsh near the town. Jim Milner, who lives on the John Black Road, is preparing a submission to the project environmental assessment claiming that its existence threatens the future of the John Lusby Marsh as a wildlife habitat. “Wildlife is the property of the Crown so it is the duty of the province to protect wildlife, not sell to the lowest proponent bidder,” Milner said in his submission. “Environment Canada is responsible for preserving and enhancing the quality of the natural environment and it needs to be respected, protected and conserved. These areas must be avoided for the use of turbines.”

AMHERST - An Amherst-area resident is continuing his fight to stop a proposed wind farm on the marsh near the town. Jim Milner, who lives on the John Black Road, is preparing a submission to the project environmental assessment claiming that its existence threatens the future of the John Lusby Marsh as a wildlife habitat. “Wildlife is the property of the Crown so it is the duty of the province to protect wildlife, not sell to the lowest proponent bidder,” Milner said in his submission. “Environment Canada is responsible for preserving and enhancing the quality of the natural environment and it needs to be respected, protected and conserved. These areas must be avoided for the use of turbines.”

Earlier this month, Nova Scotia Power and Accionia Energy announced plans to construct a 20-turbine windfarm on the marsh near Exit 3 of the Trans-Canada Highway. Construction is expected to begin next April and be operational as early as five months later. Milner said the screening process is flawed because studies surrounding migratory bird paths were not conducted during peak periods and suggests the province ignored potential adverse affects on the John Lusby Marsh. “How can a proponent demonstrate that there are no significant adverse disturbances on the John Lusby Marsh? If so, put up a bond to prove it,” he said, questioning how negative impacts to the eco-system and the marsh can be avoided.

Milner said the marsh area and the LaPlanche River receive high numbers of migratory birds every year. It’s his belief that giant turbines and spinning blades will change migratory patterns and threaten the birds themselves...

http://www.novascotiabusinessjournal.com/index.cfm?sid=134720&sc=107

Permalink |  Trackback

Comments (1)   Add Comment
Re: Turbines hazardous to wildlife habitat: Amherst resident    By Robert Gould on Sunday, June 22, 2008
Certainly, wind turbines are hazardous to wildlife. So are motor vehicles, large, glass-enclosed buildings, pollution from fuel-based power production, and power dams. We have a number of turbines in operation now; has anybody done a body-count? If a wind farm can replace a coal-burning power plant, the net result might be positive for wildlife and people alike.


Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment   Cancel 
Schooner Solutions Inc
 search  Print   
 archive  Print   
advertise on atlanticenergy.ca
Terms Of Use  |  Copyright 2007 by Schooner Solutions Inc   |  Privacy Statement